Purity vs Presentation. Some notes.

Loop of making

  1. experience of a push/pull to make or explore something
  2. the doing process (almost meditative)
  3. [a]
  4. evaluating what has been made and adjusting it to be more coherent with and in itself
  5. [b]
  6. exhibiting it in a way that again is with and in itself coherent with the work and the space
  7. [c]
  8. reflecting on perceiving the exhibited
  9. creation of meaning and context
  10. [d]
  11. reevaluation if work is itself and in its context in and with itself coherent
  12. potential reevaluation of phases 4 and 6
  13. then repetition of phases 8 – 11
  14. potential repetition of phases 12 and 13

a = raw (pure) state
b = repaired state (adjustment phase 1)
c = polished state (adjustment phase 2)
d = assessed state

Is not everything past state a inauthentic? It seems this could be where being and thinking splits, where authenticity becomes a virtue of being (subconscious?) rather than conscious acting, as conscious acting can never be pure. I hesitate to continue past state a. If I want to get closer to where a came from, why would I move in the opposite direction towards b, c and d in the direction of an end, a finished work? Why finish it? Is it not already complete in state a? Or is it me not wanting to take responsibility for it, take responsibility for my consciousness?


About the author

Karolina: